Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro M2000
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
System Shared
128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M2000 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M2000 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 496 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
5−6
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
30−35
ultra / 1080p
7−8
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
16−18
65−70
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
230−240
medium / 768p
85−90
200−210
ultra / 1080p
40−45
120−130
QHD / 1440p
24−27
90−95
4K / 2160p
−
50−55
high / 768p
60−65
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 151% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
24−27
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 116% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
8−9
low / 720p
12−14
50−55
medium / 1080p
6−7
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 285% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
8−9
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
120−130
medium / 1080p
14−16
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 186% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
18−20
70−75
medium / 1080p
10−11
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 284% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
100−110
medium / 768p
35−40
95−100
high / 1080p
8−9
40−45
ultra / 1080p
5−6
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 182% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
12−14
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
8−9
40−45
medium / 1080p
5−6
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
70−75
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
8−9
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
16−18
75−80
medium / 768p
12−14
45−50
high / 1080p
7−8
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 310% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
40−45
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro M2000
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
GM206
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
8 April 2016
Pipelines
48
768
Core clock speed
300 MHz
796 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1163 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
55.82
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
1,812 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6612 MHz
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.4
4.5
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
+
CUDA
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
215 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
