Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro M520
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M520.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M520 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M520 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro M520
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
25 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M520 has 66% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M520 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro M520 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M520 is 456 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M520 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
9−10
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
21−24
medium / 1080p
5−6
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
160−170
medium / 768p
85−90
130−140
ultra / 1080p
40−45
65−70
QHD / 1440p
24−27
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
60−65
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
70−75
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
10−12
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
24−27
medium / 1080p
6−7
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
low / 720p
50−55
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Fortnite is 54% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−11
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
60−65
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
high / 1080p
8−9
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 56% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
6−7
ultra / 1080p
2−3
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
8−9
18−20
medium / 1080p
5−6
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
90−95
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Minecraft is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
16−18
35−40
medium / 768p
12−14
21−24
high / 1080p
7−8
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
ultra / 1080p
14−16
24−27
high / 768p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M520 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Quadro M520
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Maxwell
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
13 January 2017
Pipelines
48
384
Core clock speed
300 MHz
756 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1019 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory bandwidth
40 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.4
4.5
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
nView Display Management
+
3D Stereo
+
Check Price
Check Price
