Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro T1000
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro T1000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Quadro T1000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro T1000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Quadro T1000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | System Shared | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Quadro T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro T1000 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Quadro T1000 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 1095 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 201% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 571% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 363% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 500% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Quadro T1000 | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Turing |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | TU117 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 June 2015 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Quadro T1000 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Quadro T1000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro M4000
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Quadro T1000 vs Quadro M4000
- Quadro T1000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti