Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon 520
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon 520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon 520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon 520 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon 520 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon 520
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
50 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
System Shared
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon 520 has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 730 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon 520 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
0−1
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
1−2
medium / 1080p
5−6
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon 520.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
55−60
medium / 768p
85−90
30−33
ultra / 1080p
40−45
6−7
QHD / 1440p
24−27
−
high / 768p
60−65
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than Radeon 520.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
10−11
ultra / 1080p
24−27
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
6−7
−
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
14−16
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
9−10
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−11
0−1
low / 768p
40−45
18−20
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
8−9
0−1
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
3−4
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
8−9
0−1
medium / 1080p
5−6
−
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
high / 1080p
80−85
27−30
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 60% more, than Radeon 520.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
24−27
10−11
medium / 1080p
16−18
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 110% more, than Radeon 520.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
8−9
0−1
low / 768p
16−18
0−1
medium / 768p
12−14
−
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
0−1
high / 768p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Radeon 520.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon 520
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
GCN 1.0
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
Oland
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
2 June 2015
21 March 2017
Pipelines
48
320
Core clock speed
300 MHz
1030 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
20.60
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
659.2 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth
16 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12.0
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
+
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
