Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon 540
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon 540 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon 540 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon 540
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon 540 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon 540 has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon 540 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon 540 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon 540 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 540 is 800 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon 540 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon 540 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Fortnite is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Forza Horizon 4 is 23% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon 540 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon 540 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3e | Lexa |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 June 2015 | 26 March 2019 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 35.97 |
| Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 56 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |