Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 5970
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon HD 5970 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 5970 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 5970
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon HD 5970 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 294 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 5970 has 1860% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon HD 5970 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 5970 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon HD 5970 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 5970 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 5970 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Battlefield 5 is 127% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon HD 5970 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Dota 2 is 60% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Fortnite is 77% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Forza Horizon 4 is 115% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 120% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 5970 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon HD 5970 | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | Hemlock |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 June 2015 | 18 November 2009 |
Pipelines | 48 | 1600 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,154 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 58.00 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 2x 2,320.0 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Radeon HD 5970 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Radeon HD 5970 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 5870
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs FirePro V7900
- Radeon HD 5970 vs Radeon HD 5870
- Radeon HD 5970 vs FirePro V7900