Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon Pro 460
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon Pro 460, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 stacks up against Radeon Pro 460, check out specs charts below.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 460 has 133% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon Pro 460 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
220−230
medium / 768p
85−90
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 125% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
24−27
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 228% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
14−16
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
30−33
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 223% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
85−90
high / 1080p
8−9
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
2−3
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
16−18
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
40−45
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon Pro 460
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Polaris
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
8 August 2016
Pipelines
48
1024
Core clock speed
300 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
907 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
58.05
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
1,858 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
227 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price