Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type
System Shared
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 383% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
35−40
ultra / 1080p
7−8
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
16−18
75−80
medium / 1080p
8−9
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 354% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
240−250
medium / 768p
85−90
210−220
ultra / 1080p
40−45
130−140
QHD / 1440p
24−27
100−110
4K / 2160p
−
60−65
high / 768p
60−65
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 168% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
110−120
ultra / 1080p
24−27
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
30−33
ultra / 1080p
5−6
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
3−4
9−10
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 357% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
30−33
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
low / 720p
50−55
130−140
medium / 1080p
14−16
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 222% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
40−45
ultra / 1080p
−
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 720p
18−20
75−80
medium / 1080p
10−11
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 323% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
110−120
medium / 768p
35−40
100−110
high / 1080p
8−9
45−50
ultra / 1080p
5−6
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 213% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
8−9
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
80−85
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
8−9
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 275% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
16−18
85−90
medium / 768p
12−14
55−60
high / 1080p
7−8
30−33
ultra / 1080p
5−6
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
45−50
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Vega
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
Vega Mobile
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 June 2015
15 November 2018
Pipelines
48
1024
Core clock speed
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1190 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
76.16
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
Memory bus width
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.2.131
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
