Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R5 430 OEM. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R5 430 OEM. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 430 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 22% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 3% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3e | Oland |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 June 2015 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro K2000M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs UHD Graphics 620