Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R7 A265

    In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Check Price
    Radeon R7 A265

    Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:

    Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Radeon R7 A265
    Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
    Memory type System Shared DDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price
    • Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
    • Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
    • Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 A265 - by 28 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 4−5 1−2
    ultra / 1080p 3−4 0−1
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 12−14 12−14
    medium / 1080p 5−6 3−4
    The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Radeon R7 A265.

    Full Specs

      Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Radeon R7 A265
    Architecture Gen. 8 Broadwell GCN 1.0
    Code name Broadwell GT3e Opal
    Type Laptop Desktop
    Release date 2 June 2015 9 January 2014
    Pipelines 48 384
    Core clock speed 300 MHz 725 MHz
    Boost Clock 1150 MHz 825 MHz
    Transistor count 189 million 950 million
    Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 40.80 19.80
    Floating-point performance 883.2 gflops 633.6 gflops
    Memory bus width 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s
    Shared memory +
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12 (11_1)
    Shader Model 5.1 5.1
    OpenGL 4.4 4.6
    OpenCL 2.0 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.80 1.2.131
    Laptop size medium sized
    Quick Sync +
      Check Price

    Similar compares