Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R7 M270DX
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R7 M270DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | IGP |
Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 13% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Minecraft is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | Topaz |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 June 2015 | 11 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 48 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 940 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 22.56 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon E6760
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs HD Graphics 515
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon E6760
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs HD Graphics 515