Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R8 M535DX
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R8 M535DX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R8 M535DX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R8 M535DX
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | IGP |
| Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon R8 M535DX uses IGP interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R8 M535DX - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon R8 M535DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R8 M535DX is 480 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R8 M535DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M535DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 171% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M535DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 60% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 100% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3e | Meso |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 June 2015 | 18 April 2017 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 891 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 17.82 |
| Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs NVS 510
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GRID K160Q
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs NVS 510
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs GRID K160Q