Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M270X

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R9 M270X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 6200 stacks up against Radeon R9 M270X, check out specs charts below.

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Check Price

Radeon R9 M270X

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Laptops

Main Specs

	Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Radeon R9 M270X
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	6−7
ultra / 1080p	3−4	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	16−18
medium / 1080p	5−6	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	16−18	24−27
medium / 1080p	8−9	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	130−140
medium / 768p	85−90	100−110
ultra / 1080p	40−45	50−55
QHD / 1440p	24−27	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	60−65	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	70−75	75−80
medium / 768p	45−50	55−60
ultra / 1080p	24−27	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	6−7	8−9
ultra / 1080p	5−6	7−8
4K / 2160p	3−4	3−4
low / 720p	12−14	18−20
medium / 1080p	6−7	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Fortnite is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	9−10	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	18−20	24−27
medium / 1080p	10−11	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	40−45	50−55
medium / 768p	35−40	45−50
high / 1080p	8−9	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	3−4	4−5
ultra / 1080p	2−3	3−4
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	12−14
medium / 1080p	5−6	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
high / 1080p	80−85	85−90
ultra / 1080p	70−75	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	16−18	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	30−35
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
ultra / 1080p	7−8	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	10−12
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	16−18	24−27
medium / 768p	12−14	16−18
high / 1080p	7−8	9−10
ultra / 1080p	5−6	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	80−85	85−90
medium / 768p	35−40	40−45
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
high / 768p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.

Full Specs

	Iris Pro Graphics 6200	Radeon R9 M270X
Architecture	Gen. 8 Broadwell	GCN 1.0
Code name	Broadwell GT3e	Venus
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	2 June 2015	21 March 2014
Pipelines	48	640
Core clock speed	300 MHz	725 MHz
Boost Clock	1150 MHz	775 MHz
Transistor count	189 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	40.80	31.00
Floating-point performance	883.2 gflops	1,536 gflops
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth		72 GB/s
Shared memory	+
DirectX	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
OpenCL	2.0	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.80
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Quick Sync	+
Compute units		10
	Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M270X

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares