Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M360
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R9 M360, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R9 M360 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M360
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon R9 M360 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M360 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R9 M360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Fortnite is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Forza Horizon 4 is 61% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M360 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R9 M360 | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | Tropo |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 June 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 48 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R7 M465X
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7750
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Radeon R7 M465X
- Radeon R9 M360 vs Radeon HD 7750