Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon RX 460 mobile, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon RX 460 mobile.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon RX 460 mobile are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon RX 460 mobile are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
System Shared
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX 460 mobile has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon RX 460 mobile are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
16−18
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
210−220
medium / 768p
85−90
180−190
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
60−65
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
60−65
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 38% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
24−27
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
20−22
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 214% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Fortnite is 145% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
18−20
55−60
medium / 1080p
10−11
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
80−85
high / 1080p
8−9
30−35
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−11
ultra / 1080p
2−3
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
16−18
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 mobile in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Polaris
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
2 June 2015
8 August 2016
Pipelines
48
896
Core clock speed
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1180 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
66.08
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
2,115 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price