Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon RX Vega M GL, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 or Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
IGP
Memory type
System Shared
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 333% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 631 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
220−230
medium / 768p
85−90
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 125% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
24−27
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 228% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
14−16
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 159% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
9−10
30−33
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 223% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
40−45
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
85−90
high / 1080p
8−9
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
2−3
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
16−18
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
40−45
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
Gen. 8 Broadwell
GCN 4.0
Code name
Broadwell GT3e
Polaris 22
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
2 June 2015
1 February 2018
Pipelines
48
1280
Core clock speed
300 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1011 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
40.80
80.88
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
2,588 gflops
Memory bus width
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.2.131
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price