Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Fermi |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 June 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X