Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Tesla T4
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Tesla T4 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Tesla T4 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla T4
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 70 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 366% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Tesla T4 is 285 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 201% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 571% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 363% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 500% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Turing |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | TU104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 June 2015 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 48 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1590 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 320.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Tesla T4 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Tesla T4 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL 870
- Tesla T4 vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
- Tesla T4 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL 870