FirePro W7100 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
When comparing FirePro W7100 and Iris Pro Graphics P580, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7100 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W7100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 2566% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- FirePro W7100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 56 GB more memory, than FirePro W7100.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 570 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 215% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 86% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 59% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 261% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 183% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | Tonga | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 75.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.97 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 690
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 690
- FirePro W7100 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2