FirePro W8100 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics P580 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 1366% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 56 GB more memory, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 474 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 215% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 213% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 86% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 59% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 261% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 183% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 152% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | Hawaii | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 75.60 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.97 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro P2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2