GeForce 9800 GTX vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
In this comparison between GeForce 9800 GTX and Iris Pro Graphics P580 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 9800 GTX will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics P580 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 9800 GTX
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 833% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 448 GB more memory, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 1338 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 342% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 9800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 193% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 250% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Architecture | Tesla | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | G92 | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 28 March 2008 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 128 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 75.60 |
Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | Via Adapter | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs Radeon HD 4810
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs Radeon R8 M365DX
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon HD 4810
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R8 M365DX
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2