GeForce GTS 160M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

In this comparison between GeForce GTS 160M and Iris Pro Graphics P580 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 160M will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics P580 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTS 160M Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics P580 Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M and Iris Pro Graphics P580 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Iris Pro Graphics P580 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:

GeForce GTS 160M Laptops

Iris Pro Graphics P580 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Iris Pro Graphics P580
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type	GDDR3	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	64 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M has 300% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 63 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 1150 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	21−24
medium / 1080p	0−1	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p	60−65	170−180
medium / 768p	27−30	140−150
ultra / 1080p	7−8	70−75
QHD / 1440p	−	40−45
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	16−18	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 342% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	10−11	75−80
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 193% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	75−80
medium / 1080p	0−1	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	18−20
low / 768p	18−20	65−70
medium / 768p	−	55−60
high / 1080p	0−1	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	−	9−10
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	90−95
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	0−1	35−40
medium / 768p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	50−55
ultra / 1080p	0−1	24−27
high / 768p	12−14	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Iris Pro Graphics P580
Architecture	G9x	Gen. 9 Skylake
Code name	N10E-GS1	Skylake GT4e
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2 March 2009	1 September 2015
Pipelines	64	72
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	350 MHz
Boost Clock		1100 MHz
Transistor count	505 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	19 billion/sec	75.60
Floating-point performance	192 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory bandwidth	51 GB/s
Shared memory	-	+
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.4
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.97
CUDA	+
CUDA cores	64
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options	2-way
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Laptop size	large
Quick Sync		+
Gigaflops	288
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580

GeForce GTS 160M and Iris Pro Graphics P580 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares