GeForce GTX 285 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
When comparing GeForce GTX 285 and Iris Pro Graphics P580, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 285 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Power consumption (TDP)
204 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
64 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285 has 1260% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
GeForce GTX 285 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 63 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285.
GeForce GTX 285 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 285 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 285 is 1126 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
10−11
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
21−24
medium / 1080p
9−10
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 285 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
170−180
medium / 768p
110−120
140−150
ultra / 1080p
55−60
70−75
QHD / 1440p
30−35
40−45
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
85−90
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
27−30
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
75−80
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
8−9
10−12
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
20−22
27−30
medium / 1080p
9−10
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
low / 720p
60−65
75−80
medium / 1080p
24−27
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
5−6
6−7
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
18−20
medium / 1080p
7−8
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
90−95
medium / 1080p
90−95
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
18−20
medium / 1080p
10−12
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
24−27
35−40
medium / 768p
16−18
21−24
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
ultra / 1080p
20−22
24−27
high / 768p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Gen. 9 Skylake
Code name
GT200B
Skylake GT4e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
23 December 2008
1 September 2015
Pipelines
240
72
Core clock speed
1476 MHz
350 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
51.8 billion/sec
75.60
Floating-point performance
708.5 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
512 Bit
Memory clock speed
1242 MHz
Memory bandwidth
159.0 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.97
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Quick Sync
+
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Check Price
Check Price
