GeForce GTX 465 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 465 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 465 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics P580 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
64 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 1233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 63 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 865 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
6−7
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
21−24
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
20−22
14−16
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
50−55
35−40
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 465 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
200−210
170−180
medium / 768p
170−180
140−150
ultra / 1080p
95−100
70−75
QHD / 1440p
50−55
40−45
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−33
high / 768p
130−140
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
90−95
75−80
ultra / 1080p
60−65
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Dota 2 is 19% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
16−18
10−12
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
4K / 2160p
6−7
4−5
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Far Cry 5 is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
95−100
75−80
medium / 1080p
50−55
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Fortnite is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
QHD / 1440p
8−9
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
35−40
medium / 1080p
27−30
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
80−85
65−70
medium / 768p
70−75
55−60
high / 1080p
27−30
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
QHD / 1440p
2−3
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
9−10
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
90−95
medium / 1080p
100−110
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
21−24
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
40−45
medium / 1080p
24−27
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
18−20
medium / 1080p
16−18
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
50−55
35−40
medium / 768p
30−35
21−24
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
30−35
24−27
high / 768p
50−55
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 465 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 9 Skylake
Code name
GF100
Skylake GT4e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
31 May 2010
1 September 2015
Pipelines
352
72
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
350 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
75.60
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.97
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price
