GeForce GTX 560M vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 560M and Iris Pro Graphics P580 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 560M will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics P580 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 560M and Iris Pro Graphics P580 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 560M and Iris Pro Graphics P580 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M or Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 560M
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1536 MB
64 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 560M has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
GeForce GTX 560M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
GeForce GTX 560M has 1472 GB more memory, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 560M is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
10−11
ultra / 1080p
2−3
6−7
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
21−24
medium / 1080p
7−8
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 560M and Iris Pro Graphics P580 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
170−180
medium / 768p
100−110
140−150
ultra / 1080p
50−55
70−75
QHD / 1440p
24−27
40−45
4K / 2160p
12−14
30−33
high / 768p
75−80
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
75−80
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
7−8
10−12
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−12
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
27−30
medium / 1080p
7−8
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
7−8
18−20
ultra / 1080p
0−1
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
55−60
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
50−55
65−70
medium / 768p
−
55−60
high / 1080p
10−12
18−20
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
medium / 720p
45−50
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
3−4
6−7
ultra / 1080p
1−2
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
10−11
18−20
medium / 1080p
5−6
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
80−85
90−95
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
9−10
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
20−22
35−40
medium / 768p
12−14
21−24
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
50−55
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
high / 768p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 560M
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 9 Skylake
Code name
N12E-GS
Skylake GT4e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
30 May 2011
1 September 2015
Pipelines
192
72
Core clock speed
775 MHz
350 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
24.8 billion/sec
75.60
Floating-point performance
595.2 gflops
Memory clock speed
1250 MHz
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.97
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
192
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
44 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
