GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 950A and Iris Pro Graphics P580 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 950A will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics P580 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 950A
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 950A has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GeForce GTX 950A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 62 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 950A.
- GeForce GTX 950A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 950A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 643 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 950A and Iris Pro Graphics P580 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Fortnite is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GM107 | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 75.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 32.03 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R9 M470
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- GeForce GTX 950A vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2