GeForce MX450 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
When comparing GeForce MX450 and Iris Pro Graphics P580, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX450 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce MX450 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce MX450 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX450 or Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX450
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5,GDDR6
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
64 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce MX450 has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
GeForce MX450 is connected by PCIe 4.0 x4, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 62 GB more memory, than GeForce MX450.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce MX450 is build with Turing architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX450 is 1045 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
GeForce MX450 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−11
6−7
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 61% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
27−30
16−18
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
60−65
35−40
medium / 1080p
30−35
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
50−55
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
220−230
170−180
medium / 768p
190−200
140−150
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
QHD / 1440p
70−75
40−45
4K / 2160p
35−40
30−33
high / 768p
150−160
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
45−50
27−30
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
110−120
90−95
medium / 768p
100−110
75−80
ultra / 1080p
70−75
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
21−24
10−12
ultra / 1080p
20−22
10−12
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
4−5
low / 720p
45−50
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Far Cry 5 is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
27−30
18−20
ultra / 1080p
21−24
12−14
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
110−120
75−80
medium / 1080p
60−65
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Fortnite is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
30−33
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
QHD / 1440p
10−12
4−5
low / 720p
60−65
35−40
medium / 1080p
30−35
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
95−100
65−70
medium / 768p
85−90
55−60
high / 1080p
35−40
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
8−9
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
10−12
6−7
ultra / 1080p
9−10
5−6
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
14−16
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
−
90−95
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
18−20
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
65−70
35−40
medium / 768p
40−45
21−24
high / 1080p
21−24
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
35−40
24−27
high / 768p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX450 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Full Specs
GeForce MX450
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Architecture
Turing
Gen. 9 Skylake
Code name
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Skylake GT4e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
1 August 2020
1 September 2015
Pipelines
896
72
Core clock speed
1395 MHz
350 MHz
Boost Clock
1575 MHz
1100 MHz
Transistor count
4,700 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
75.60
Memory bus width
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
10002 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64.03 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.5
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.2
1.1.97
CUDA
7.5
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price