GRID K140Q vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
When choosing between GRID K140Q and Iris Pro Graphics P580, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K140Q and Iris Pro Graphics P580.
GRID K140Q
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
GRID K140Q | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 766% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 63 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 84% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 159% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 62% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1800% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1150% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GRID K140Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K140Q | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GK107 | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 75.60 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID K140Q vs GRID K160Q
- GRID K140Q vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GRID K160Q
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680
- GRID K140Q vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- GRID K140Q vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2