GRID K160Q vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K160Q and Iris Pro Graphics P580. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K160Q and Iris Pro Graphics P580. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K160Q
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 766% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GRID K160Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 63 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GRID K160Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
- GRID K160Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GRID K160Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 147% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 62% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1800% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GK107 | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 75.60 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID K160Q vs Radeon R8 M535DX
- GRID K160Q vs GRID K140Q
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R8 M535DX
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GRID K140Q
- GRID K160Q vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- GRID K160Q vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2