GRID K280Q vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
When choosing between GRID K280Q and Iris Pro Graphics P580, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K280Q and Iris Pro Graphics P580.
GRID K280Q
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
GRID K280Q | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K280Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 60 GB more memory, than GRID K280Q.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 395 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K280Q and Iris Pro Graphics P580 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. |
Full Specs
GRID K280Q | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GK104 | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 75.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID K280Q vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GRID K280Q vs Quadro K3100M
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro K3100M
- GRID K280Q vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- GRID K280Q vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2