GRID M60 8Q vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Iris Pro Graphics P580, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M60 8Q stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics P580, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 8Q
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 56 GB more memory, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 207 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Iris Pro Graphics P580 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GM204 | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 75.60 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro K2200M
- GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro K5000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro K2200M
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro K5000
- GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- GRID M60 8Q vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2