Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs P106 090

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and P106 090, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics P580 stacks up against P106 090, check out specs charts below.

Iris Pro Graphics P580 Check Price

P106 090

Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:

Iris Pro Graphics P580 Laptops

Main Specs

	Iris Pro Graphics P580	P106 090
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price

P106 090 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and P106 090 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 61 GB more memory, than P106 090.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and P106 090 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and P106 090 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of P106 090 is 1004 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and P106 090 - by 16 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	21−24	30−35
medium / 1080p	12−14	18−20
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p	16−18	24−27
ultra / 1080p	14−16	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Battlefield 5 is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Iris Pro Graphics P580 and P106 090 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	170−180	200−210
medium / 768p	140−150	170−180
ultra / 1080p	70−75	95−100
QHD / 1440p	40−45	50−55
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	100−110	140−150
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
medium / 768p	75−80	90−95
ultra / 1080p	45−50	60−65
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p	10−12	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−12	16−18
4K / 2160p	4−5	6−7
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	18−20
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Far Cry 5 is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	75−80	95−100
medium / 1080p	35−40	50−55
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p	16−18	24−27
ultra / 1080p	14−16	20−22
QHD / 1440p	4−5	9−10
low / 720p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	18−20	27−30
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p	65−70	85−90
medium / 768p	55−60	75−80
high / 1080p	18−20	27−30
ultra / 1080p	8−9	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p	6−7	9−10
ultra / 1080p	5−6	7−8
4K / 2160p	1−2	2−3
low / 720p	18−20	27−30
medium / 1080p	9−10	12−14
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	90−95	100−110
medium / 1080p	95−100	100−110
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	40−45	55−60
medium / 1080p	20−22	24−27
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	27−30
medium / 1080p	12−14	16−18
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p	35−40	50−55
medium / 768p	21−24	30−35
high / 1080p	12−14	18−20
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−12
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
medium / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	24−27	35−40
high / 768p	40−45	50−55
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.

Full Specs

	Iris Pro Graphics P580	P106 090
Architecture	Gen. 9 Skylake	Pascal
Code name	Skylake GT4e	GP106
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 September 2015	31 July 2017
Pipelines	72	768
Core clock speed	350 MHz	1354 MHz
Boost Clock	1100 MHz	1531 MHz
Transistor count	189 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	16 nm
Texture fill rate	75.60	73.49
Floating-point performance		2,352 gflops
Length		250 mm
Memory bus width		192 Bit
Memory clock speed		8008 MHz
Memory bandwidth		192.2 GB/s
Shared memory	+
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.97	1.2.131
CUDA		6.1
Quick Sync	+
	Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs P106 090

Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares