Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro 7000
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro 7000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics P580 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 7000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro 7000
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Quadro 7000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 204 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 1260% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro 7000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 58 GB more memory, than Quadro 7000.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro 7000 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro 7000 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro 7000 is 301 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro 7000 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 69% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Quadro 7000 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | GF110 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 2 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 72 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 651 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 75.60 | 41.66 |
Floating-point performance | 1,332 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 163.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Quadro 7000 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Quadro 7000 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro M2000M
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Tesla M10
- Quadro 7000 vs Quadro M2000M
- Quadro 7000 vs Tesla M10