Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro K2000D
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro K2000D, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro K2000D is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Quadro K2000D
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
51 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K2000D has 240% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K2000D uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 62 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000D.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2000D - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro K2000D - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000D is 604 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000D - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
7−8
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro K2000D have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
170−180
140−150
medium / 768p
140−150
110−120
ultra / 1080p
70−75
55−60
QHD / 1440p
40−45
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
100−110
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
75−80
60−65
ultra / 1080p
45−50
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
10−12
9−10
ultra / 1080p
10−12
8−9
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
21−24
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 18% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−12
low / 720p
75−80
65−70
medium / 1080p
35−40
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
QHD / 1440p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
6−7
5−6
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
9−10
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
90−95
80−85
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Quadro K2000D.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
35−40
27−30
medium / 768p
21−24
18−20
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than Quadro K2000D.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
high / 768p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro K2000D.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Quadro K2000D
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Kepler
Code name
Skylake GT4e
GK107
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
1 March 2013
Pipelines
72
384
Core clock speed
350 MHz
954 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
75.60
30.53
Floating-point performance
732.7 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.97
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
31 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
