Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro K2200M
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics P580 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 333% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 62 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 317 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Maxwell |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 72 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 75.60 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Quadro K2200M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Quadro K2200M vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs FirePro S9050
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GRID M60 8Q
- Quadro K2200M vs FirePro S9050
- Quadro K2200M vs GRID M60 8Q