Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro M2000
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro M2000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Quadro M2000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M2000 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 60 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro M2000 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 446 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 92% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
16−18
30−35
ultra / 1080p
14−16
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
35−40
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
170−180
230−240
medium / 768p
140−150
200−210
ultra / 1080p
70−75
120−130
QHD / 1440p
40−45
90−95
4K / 2160p
30−33
50−55
high / 768p
100−110
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
75−80
100−110
ultra / 1080p
45−50
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 44% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
10−12
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
8−9
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
12−14
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 107% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
18−20
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
75−80
120−130
medium / 1080p
35−40
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
27−30
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
35−40
70−75
medium / 1080p
18−20
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
65−70
100−110
medium / 768p
55−60
95−100
high / 1080p
18−20
40−45
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 71% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
70−75
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
35−40
75−80
medium / 768p
21−24
45−50
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
4K / 2160p
7−8
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Quadro M2000
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
Skylake GT4e
GM206
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
8 April 2016
Pipelines
72
768
Core clock speed
350 MHz
796 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1163 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
75.60
55.82
Floating-point performance
1,812 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6612 MHz
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Shader Model
6.4
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.97
+
CUDA
5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
215 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Check Price
Check Price
