Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon E6760
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon E6760 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics P580 will be the best choice, for others Radeon E6760 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon E6760
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon E6760 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon E6760 has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon E6760 uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 63 GB more memory, than Radeon E6760.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Radeon E6760 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon E6760 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon E6760 is 250 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon E6760 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 187% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon E6760 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 58% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon E6760 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 137% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Radeon E6760. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon E6760. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon E6760 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | Turks |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 2 May 2011 |
Pipelines | 72 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 75.60 | 14.40 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 52 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Radeon E6760 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Radeon E6760 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro FX 4800
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R7 M270DX
- Radeon E6760 vs Quadro FX 4800
- Radeon E6760 vs Radeon R7 M270DX