Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon HD 7670A
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon HD 7670A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon HD 7670A.
Radeon HD 7670A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 7670A has 200% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 7670A uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 63 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7670A.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 7670A - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon HD 7670A - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7670A is 250 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7670A - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon HD 7670A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7670A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 41% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 15% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon HD 7670A. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon HD 7670A | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | Turks |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 5 January 2012 |
Pipelines | 72 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 600 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 75.60 | 14.40 |
Floating-point performance | 576.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Radeon HD 7670A vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon HD 6750
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 850A
- Radeon HD 7670A vs Radeon HD 6750
- Radeon HD 7670A vs GeForce GTX 850A