Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
When comparing Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon R5 430 OEM, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon R5 430 OEM is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 62 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 380 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 187% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 72% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 100% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 160% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT4e | Oland |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 72 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 75.60 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | 1.2.131 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro K2000M
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs UHD Graphics 620