Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R9 A375
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon R9 A375, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon R9 A375.
Radeon R9 A375
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 62 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 46% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 89% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 32% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | no data |
Pipelines | 72 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 75.60 | 37.00 |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4.5 GB/s | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | 1.2 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M