Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R9 M270X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon R9 M270X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon R9 M270X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 M270X
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 60 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 375 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M270X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 44% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 44% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 72 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 75.60 | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Radeon R9 M270X vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370