Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics P580 stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 1486% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 58 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 224 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 59% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 69% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 62% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 64% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Fermi |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 72 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 75.60 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Tesla C2070 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost