Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics P580 stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 58 GB more memory, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 224 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Far Cry 5 is 116% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Fortnite is 44% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics P580 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Fermi |
| Code name | Skylake GT4e | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 September 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 72 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 75.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Tesla M2070 Q vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X