FirePro M4150 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 315 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- FirePro M4150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 444% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4150 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 150% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 127% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 650% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 268% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 428% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 233% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 766% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 660% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Opal | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce 830A
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce 830A
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395