FirePro S9000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
When comparing FirePro S9000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 58% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S9000 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 47% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 63% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Tahiti | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M295X
- FirePro S9000 vs P106 100
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M295X
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs P106 100
- FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395