FirePro V5800 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
When choosing between FirePro V5800 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
FirePro V5800
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 290 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 225% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 253% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 43% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 98% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 233% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 165% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 146% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 177% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 246% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 36% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Juniper | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 800 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R7 M370
- FirePro V5800 vs Quadro K2100M
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R7 M370
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro K2100M
- FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395