FirePro W5100 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
When choosing between FirePro W5100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
FirePro W5100
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 530 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 43% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 47% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 17% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 42% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 31% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 48% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 38% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 9% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 35% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 46% more, than FirePro W5100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Bonaire | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 768 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R7 260X
- FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R7 260X
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
- FirePro W5100 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395