FirePro W7100 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
In this comparison between FirePro W7100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7100 will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7100
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 520 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 58% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W7100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro W7100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 47% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 63% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Tonga | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 690
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 690
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- FirePro W7100 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395