FirePro W8100 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W8100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W8100 stacks up against Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W8100
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 424 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 61% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W8100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro W8100 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 47% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 63% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Hawaii | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Quadro P2000
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- FirePro W8100 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395