FireStream 9370 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
When comparing FireStream 9370 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 425 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 76% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 73% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 31% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 76% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 55% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 14% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 72% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Cypress | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395